and extracts the following text as a script body — the dev server then fails its dependency scan with `Expected ";" but found "non"` from the words "non-allowlisted hosts", which breaks e2e. So, what this buys, so nobody reads more or less into it: blocks external `script src=` from non-allowlisted hosts blocks injected inline scripts — each one is pinned by hash blocks fetch/XHR/WebSocket exfiltration (connect-src allowlist) blocks form-action, base-uri, object-src vectors does not stop image-based exfiltration — img-src must allow https: because event media comes from arbitrary publishers' og:image The cost of hashing is that an inline script edited after the hashes are computed is silently refused by the browser. That is why the violation reporter below exists: report-uri/report-to are ignored in a meta element and Pages serves no CSP header, so violations are caught in-page and sent to PostHog instead (src/lib/csp-report.ts, #241). frame-ancestors is deliberately NOT in this string: it is ignored in a meta element and browsers log a warning about it on every page load. It lives in public/_headers instead, ready for a CDN in front of Pages. X-Frame-Options (set there too) is the clickjacking control that actually applies today. */ }
political

Civil Society and JPR Welcome Tshisekedi's Dialogue Clarifications as C64 Holds Firm in Rejection

| DRC Conflict

DRC civil society and the Justes Patriotes pour la République (JPR) party welcomed President Tshisekedi's clarifications on the format of his national dialogue, in remarks reported Aug 30. Civil society general coordinator Christopher Ngoy Mutamba called the initiative "mûrement réfléchie" (thoroughly deliberated), saying the president's clarifications addressed several of its concerns over venue, organization and participation, while insisting inclusivity must not extend to armed groups, whose members it said must answer for crimes rather than be integrated into the political process. JPR urged the opposition to seize the "outstretched hand" and use the dialogue to defend its political convictions. The reception contrasts with the Coalition Article 64 (C64)'s Aug 28 rejection of the same dialogue as "pretended consultations," underscoring a split in the domestic opposition's response even as the process runs on a track separate from the Doha-mediated DRC-M23 negotiations.

Media

DRC civil society coordinator Christopher Ngoy Mutamba comments on Tshisekedi's national dialogue clarifications, Aug 30, 2026
DRC civil society coordinator Christopher Ngoy Mutamba comments on Tshisekedi's national dialogue clarifications, Aug 30, 2026 — CongoQuotidien

Sources

View full DRC Conflict dashboard