and extracts the following text as a script body — the dev server then fails its dependency scan with `Expected ";" but found "non"` from the words "non-allowlisted hosts", which breaks e2e. So, what this buys, so nobody reads more or less into it: blocks external `script src=` from non-allowlisted hosts blocks injected inline scripts — each one is pinned by hash blocks fetch/XHR/WebSocket exfiltration (connect-src allowlist) blocks form-action, base-uri, object-src vectors does not stop image-based exfiltration — img-src must allow https: because event media comes from arbitrary publishers' og:image The cost of hashing is that an inline script edited after the hashes are computed is silently refused by the browser. That is why the violation reporter below exists: report-uri/report-to are ignored in a meta element and Pages serves no CSP header, so violations are caught in-page and sent to PostHog instead (src/lib/csp-report.ts, #241). frame-ancestors is deliberately NOT in this string: it is ignored in a meta element and browsers log a warning about it on every page load. It lives in public/_headers instead, ready for a CDN in front of Pages. X-Frame-Options (set there too) is the clickjacking control that actually applies today. */ }
diplomatic medium confidence

Pakistan Signals Willingness to Extend Operational Pause in Op Ghazab Conditionally — No New Strikes If Afghan Territory Kept Clear of TTP

| Afghanistan War

May 7, 2026: Pakistani media outlet Abb Takk reported that Pakistan is signalling a willingness to extend its operational pause within Operation Ghazab lil-Haq on a conditional basis — specifically, that no new cross-border strikes would be launched as long as no attacks against Pakistani territory originate from Afghan soil and TTP (Fitna al-Khawarij) is not allowed to regroup in Afghan border areas. The signal is a conditional de-escalation posture, distinct from a formal ceasefire. Pakistan has not publicly declared a pause and DG ISPR's May 7 presser simultaneously confirmed the operation remains active. The conditional framing mirrors Pakistan's overall diplomatic position: operations will continue until the Taliban provides 'credible guarantees' on TTP, but tactical pauses may occur if Afghan behavior warrants them. The development is significant in the context of mounting international pressure: UK Special Envoy Lindsay's May 1 criticism, the UN's May 3 alarm over Afghan deportations, and the Taliban's diplomatic escalation following the May 5 Dangam civilian casualty incident. Pakistan appears to be creating diplomatic space for itself — presenting as open to de-escalation — while maintaining the military option and linking any ceasefire to Taliban action on TTP. No formal ceasefire proposal has been made, no new Urumqi Round 2 date has been set, and China has not publicly commented on the latest developments. The Afghan Taliban has not responded to Pakistan's conditional framing as of May 7.

Pakistan signals conditional willingness to extend operational pause in Op Ghazab lil-Haq if Afghan territory is not used for TTP attacks — Abb Takk, May 7, 2026
Pakistan signals conditional willingness to extend operational pause in Op Ghazab lil-Haq if Afghan territory is not used for TTP attacks — Abb Takk, May 7, 2026 — Abb Takk